By Dr. Richard Pankhurst:-
We saw last week that Ethiopia’s traditional self-sufficiency at 
first isolated it from the impact of the Industrial Revolution, which 
took place in Europe in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth 
centuries.
The Ethiopian Import Picture: In the North
Ethiopian imports by the early nineteenth were, however, by no means 
negligible. A fair picture of early nineteenth century imports via the 
Red Sea port of Massawa, the main point of contact with the outside 
world for northern Ethiopia, may be obtained from the writings of the 
British traveller Henry Salt, who refers to the arrival at the port of 
European manufactures. These included embroidered velvets, French 
broadcloths, silks and satins, arms and ammunition, glassware and beads 
from Venice, lead in small quantities, block tin, copper and gold foil, 
as well as skins of many colours from Egypt, Indian textiles of every 
quality from fine muslin’s to coarse Surat cloth; raw cotton, small 
Persian carpets of a showy pattern and of low price, and raw silks from 
China.
In the Centre and South
The principal imports of central and southern Ethiopia, which passed 
via the Gulf of Aden ports of Tajura, Zeila and Berbera, were not 
dissimilar. They are given by the British envoy Cornwallis Harris as 
consisting, in the 1840s, mainly of Indian and Arabian textiles, pewter,
 zinc, copper and brass wire, beads and various other articles such as 
buttons, mirrors, trinkets, bottles, snuff and tobacco.
In the West
The imports of western Ethiopia, via Sudan to Gondar, were also, 
broadly speaking, of similar character. The German missionary J.L. Krapf
 writes of cotton, coloured cloth and beads, mirrors, razors, nails, 
drinking vessels, coffee cups and stibium.
Some Statistics
Though it is impossible to obtain a quantitative picture of such 
imports they were undoubtedly considerable, as may be seen from the 
fairly detailed estimates available for Massawa. The Belgian official 
Edouard Blondeel quoted figures for 1840, which suggest that 528,660 
pieces of different kinds of cloth were imported annually, while the 
French Scientific Mission of 1839-1843 stated that imports in 1842 
numbered 551,295 pieces. Other imports ,according to Blondeel, included 
300 packets of blue silk, 40,280 kilos of cotton thread, 2,000 pieces of
 Morocco leather, 1,422 kilos of old copper, 1,170 kilos of tin, 20,000 
bottles, 270 cases of glassware, 16,400,000 glass beads, 14,400 razors, 
6,690 kilos of kohl, or antimony, for the eyes, 669 kilos of cloves, and
 35,600 kilos of tobacco. The French Scientific Mission figures are 
somewhat different, and include 5,000 packets of blue silk, 10,000 
pieces of red Morocco leather, 150,000 kilos of cloves and 500,000 kilos
 of tobacco .
Unravelling Cloth
Imported cloth, which in the first part of the century was still 
overshadowed by local production, seems to have largely conformed to the
 traditional type. An interesting practice which resulted from the 
absence of fast locally made dyes was the unraveling of imported red or 
blue cloth. The thread was then used by local weavers to produce the 
telat, or coloured band, on the shamma, or toga, almost universally worn
 by the Ethiopian people. This practice of unravelling and then 
reweaving was in a sense a compromise between the desire for better 
colours and a reluctance to accept the innovation of coloured cloth 
which thus served only as raw material. A British naval man, Captain 
Wetherhead, writing in 1810, tells of a practice in Massawa where 
imported cotton was mixed with the local material before the two were 
woven together.
King Sahle Sellase of Shewa
Though essentially conservative in many respects, the Ethiopian 
rulers of the early nineteenth century, like their forebears, displayed 
considerable interest in innovation, in the military, but also to a 
lesser extent in the medical field, and, occasionally, in church and 
palace building.
King Sahle Sellase of Shewa (1813-1847) was by all accounts 
passionately interested in new techniques. He employed, we are told, 
large numbers of blacksmiths, weavers and gunsmiths at his palace. The 
German missionary Krapf states that the monarch was “so fond of 
artisans” that he often visited the workshops of the weavers, gun-makers
 and smiths. The French saint Simonians Combes and Tamisier so far as to
 observe, doubtless with exaggeration, that such workmen were “the most 
important men” Sahle Sellase’s court. The King, they add, “found time to
 devote himself to the industrial arts in which he is passionately 
interested. He liked to see work carried out under his very eyes; his 
palace was full of weavers, carpenters, masons and other workers engaged
 in making gunpowder, repairing rifles or working in gold, silver and 
ivory. His workshops likewise produced magnificent cloth, bracelets, 
swords, shields and arm guard. Sahle Sellase’s innovating interests, it 
will be perceived, had a military orientation reminiscent of that of 
earlier monarchs. Thus the traveller Schroff noted that the monarch’s 
“first intention seems to be directed to military reforms,” while the 
British ship’s surgeon Charles Johnston recalls that the King questioned
 him closely about the relative merits of gun-barrels, and adds “I had 
to describe how they were manufactured; what was the difference between 
plain and twisted; in what manner the grooves on the rifles were made; 
and whether long or short barrels were most economical for service. The 
French envoy, Rochet d’Hericourt, likewise relates that Sahle Sellase 
spoke to him of the manner of making cannon, rifles and swords. Combes 
and Tamisier tell a similar story. They record that on reaching the 
Shewan capital they were closely questioned by one of the King’s 
secretaries as to whether they could make rifles or gunpowder.
Greeks, Armenians, and Egyptians
This preoccupation with firearms was so general in early nineteenth 
century Ethiopia that foreigners, Greeks, Armenians, and Egyptians, 
could be found as gun makers or repairers in all the more important 
centres. Other foreigners were also used in one or other aspect of 
warfare. Thus Ras Walde Sellase of Tigray employed two Englishmen, 
Coffin and Pearce, in importing firearms, while his successor, Dejazmach
 Webe, commissioned a third Englishman, John Bell, as a kind of general.
Foreign Doctors
Besides the military interest in innovations, which constitutes a 
recurrent theme of these articles, early nineteenth century Ethiopia 
displayed a certain though limited willingness to utilise foreign 
medical skills. Visiting travellers, diplomats and sportsmen were 
invariably expected to treat diseases in the areas they visited, and 
many Ethiopian rulers made use of foreign doctors. This acceptance of 
the new is the more significant in that Ethiopia possessed a fairly 
sophisticated body of knowledge of medicine and surgery. Resident 
foreigners engaged in medicine in this period included an English 
surgeon, Charles Johnston, in Shewa, and an Armenian called Gorgorios in
 Tigray, who was reputed to know an excellent specific for venereal 
diseases.
Dejazmach Webe
A certain amount of innovation can also be seen at this time in 
palace and church building as manifested by the employment of foreign 
craftsmen. Thus Sahle Sellase employed a Greek called Demetrius to build
 a two-story palace at Angolala, while in Tigray Dejazmach Webe employed
 two Germans, Eichinger and Schimper, in church building. The former 
built the church of Cherkos at Addegrat, while the latter put up a 
number of buildings for the chief, including a stone church at Debra 
Egzi.
Webe and Sahle Sellase’ successor, King Besha Worrid, like so many of
 the rulers of earlier centuries, both attempted to attract craftsmen 
from abroad and negotiated with the British Government on this matter in
 1849. On March 3, the British Consul, Walter Plowden, forwarded to 
London a letter he had received from Webe which declared:
“If you can find me five or three workmen if possible at Massowah, if
 not by sending to your country, builders or masons, bring them for me ;
 if they wish for lands or appointments I will give them plenty; if they
 wish for wages I will give them wages and take care of them.”
Lord Palmerston
Plowden’s advice to the British Foreign Secretary, the redoubtable 
Lord Palmerston, was that this request should be met by the dispatch of 
an architect, a bridge-builder, a carpenter and four assistants, but the
 matter was shelved by Palmerston on account of the difficulties and 
expenses involved.
A similar request for European workmen was received from King Besha 
Worrid at almost the same time. On May 21 the British representative in 
Cairo forwarded Palmerston a letter of greeting to Queen Victoria from 
the King. The messenger who brought the epistle carried a request that 
the Queen would send the King “persons who can make a crown, and make 
cannons, and paint pictures, and build palaces.
This appeal for assistance was also destined to be rejected. Rather 
than refusing outright, Palmerston chose to gave the King a history 
lesson. He wrote back declaring:
“Her Majesty commands me to explain to you that the distance between 
England and your country is great, and the journey occupies much time 
and, moreover, the workmen in her dominions are at present much 
employed.”
Sahle Sellase’s interest in foreign craftsmen did not extend to all 
foreigners. The Protestant missionary Krapf was informed by the 
sovereign in 1839, for example, that “he did not need spiritual teachers
 so much as doctors, masons, smiths, etc. “The missionaries therefore 
laboured under considerable difficulties, and were later excluded from 
the country. In 1843, S P. Haines, the British Political Agent in Aden 
reported that the king had “interdicted the return of the missionaries,”
 and added: “The cause of the King of Showa interdicting missionaries 
from entering his territory, is owing to the power of the Priesthood 
there, who considered the Reverend Gentlemen have interfered with the 
religion of their forefathers.” Krapf himself subscribed to this view, 
and exclaims with irritation: “It was mainly the bigoted priests and 
monks who tried to inspire the King with a distrust of foreigners. The 
priests were angry with me especially, because they thought that I had 
induced the King to allow the admission of the English and their 
presents.”
Source: http://www.linkethiopia.org
No comments:
Post a Comment